Research ethics: protect participants and your work
What informed consent requires, how to move through an ethics committee, ready-to-adapt consent form templates, and the plagiarism and publication rules that journals expect authors to follow.
Three principles behind every rule
Most ethics requirements come from a few ideas set out in documents such as the Belmont Report and the Declaration of Helsinki. When a situation is not covered by a rule, return to these.
Informed consent
Consent is a process, not just a signature. Participants should understand what is being asked, have time to think and ask questions, and be free to say no or leave later without penalty.
What a consent form should cover
| Element | What to write |
|---|---|
| Purpose and who is running it | Plain-language aim, investigator and institution, and who funds the study. |
| Procedures and time | What participants will do, how long it takes, and how many sessions. |
| Risks and benefits | Honest description, including discomfort, privacy risk and the fact that there may be no direct benefit. |
| Voluntary participation | Participation is optional, and withdrawal at any time carries no penalty. |
| Confidentiality | How data are stored, who can see them, how long they are kept and whether they are anonymised or shared. |
| Compensation and costs | Any payment, reimbursement or cost to the participant. |
| Contacts | Investigator contact and the ethics committee contact for questions or complaints. |
- Write at a level your participants can read, and provide the form in their language.
- For children, get parental or guardian permission and, where appropriate, the child's own assent.
- Where people cannot read, use an impartial witness and record how consent was explained.
- For surveys, an information sheet with an "I agree to take part" checkbox is often accepted in place of a signature. Confirm with your committee.
- Keep signed forms separate from the data if you promise anonymity.
Ethics committee steps
Committees are called IRB, REC or IEC depending on the country. Names and forms differ, but the path is similar. Start early, since review can take weeks.
- Check whether review is needed. Research involving people, their identifiable data or biological samples usually needs it. Your institution can tell you if your work is exempt.
- Finish your protocol. Aims, design, sample, recruitment, instruments and analysis plan should be settled before you apply.
- Prepare the documents. Application form, participant information sheet, consent or assent form, questionnaires, recruitment materials, investigator CVs and training certificates.
- Submit and wait for triage. The committee assigns a review level: exempt, expedited or full board, depending on risk.
- Respond to comments. Outcomes are usually approval, approval with changes, or resubmission. Answer each point in a cover letter and mark changes.
- Collect data only after approval. Keep the approval letter and reference number for your journal submission.
- Report changes and problems. Submit amendments before changing the protocol and report adverse events promptly.
- Renew and close. File progress reports if required and a closing report when the study ends.
Which review level is likely?
This tool gives a rough guide only. Your own committee decides the review level.
Consent form templates
Adapt the wording to your study, remove anything that does not apply, and have your committee approve the final version. Replace every item in [square brackets].
Adult participant information and consent
Parental permission and child assent
Plagiarism and publication rules
Plagiarism is presenting someone else's words, ideas or data as your own. Journals treat it as misconduct, and outcomes range from rejection to retraction and notification of your institution.
| Type | What it looks like |
|---|---|
| Direct copying | Text copied without quotation marks and a citation. |
| Patchwriting | A source's sentences with a few words swapped. Changing words is not paraphrasing. |
| Idea plagiarism | Using someone's argument, method or result without credit, even in your own words. |
| Self-plagiarism | Reusing your published text or submitting the same work to two journals without disclosure. |
| Fabrication and falsification | Inventing data or altering results or images. These are among the most serious violations. |
| Improper authorship | Gift, ghost or omitted authors. Authorship should follow the ICMJE criteria: substantial contribution, drafting or revising, final approval, and accountability. |
- Similarity reports: tools such as Turnitin or iThenticate show overlap, not proof of plagiarism. Acceptable limits differ by journal and institution, so check the policy of your target journal.
- Citations: cite every source of ideas, data, figures and tables, and get permission for any reproduced material.
- Duplicate submission: submit to one journal at a time. Preprints must be disclosed.
- AI tools: follow the journal's policy. Most require disclosure of AI use and do not accept an AI tool as an author. You remain responsible for accuracy and originality.
- Ethics statement: state the approving committee and reference number and whether informed consent was obtained in your manuscript.
- Guidance: the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) publishes flowcharts for handling suspected misconduct.
Before you collect data or submit
0 of 7 done

